The Swiss bank UBS has reached an agreement to acquire Credit Suisse in exchange for more than 2,000 million dollars in own shares (about 1,900 million euros), in an operation that will merge the two largest entities in the country. The transaction, advanced in the afternoon of this Sunday by the Financial Timeshas been developed during an agonizing weekend, full of emergency meetings, in an attempt, finally successful, to close the sale before the market opens this Monday, when a new collapse in the Credit Suisse Stock Market was foreseeable with potential to cause losses to the entire bank.

This scenario, dangerous amid the distrust of the financial system unleashed by the fall of two banks in the US, has been avoided after a tug of war around the price. UBS’s first offer, of 1,000 million, was rejected as too low, but the pressure exerted by the Swiss authorities, and the advantages promised to the main Swiss bank to carry out the operation – it will not be necessary for it to be submitted to a vote by its shareholders, and according to Dow Jones, the Swiss National Bank has offered him a liquidity line of 100,000 million—, have been enough for him to agree to buy what was considered his great rival, even though the distance between the two had widened in the last times. While UBS was valued this Friday at market close at 56,000 million, its competitor was around 8,000 million capitalization. This means that UBS will pay almost a quarter of the 1.86 francs it was worth on the Credit Suisse Stock Exchange just a couple of days ago, that is, just over 0.50 francs per share.

The historic pact, to which the US Federal Reserve has given its approval, creates one of the largest banks in Europe, and serves to put an end to the confidence crisis that was bleeding Credit Suisse dry. The Zurich-based entity already saw deposit leaks in the last quarter of 2022. Although the Swiss National Bank insisted this week that it was broadly meeting capital and liquidity requirements, customer fears that the bank’s situation would worsen with their savings inside was fueling further money flight amid a tidal wave of negative information. That has made Credit Suisse’s continuation on its own untenable. The brand has gone from being synonymous with reliability to becoming a source of suspicion, damaging the reputation of the once unimpeachable Swiss bank, and becoming a liability to the entire industry.

The deal, which will be signed this Sunday night, is a relief for the markets, because on paper it avoids a disastrous session on Monday, but it worries about its consequences for competition. Reducing the number of large banks in the country from two to one will allow UBS to lead the Swiss market with hardly any opposition, and voices are beginning to appear in the country warning that this can harm users, by being left at the mercy of a single large bank. There is also concern among workers. Credit Suisse had 16,700 employees in Switzerland at the end of 2022 and around 50,500 worldwide. Overlaps with UBS will mean layoffs, so the Swiss Association of Bank Employees (Aseb) has called for jobs to be protected.

UBS has been benefiting from the crisis of its rival for some time, from which a good part of its new clients came, and started out in a privileged negotiating position, because it is the one that takes risks by taking over Credit Suisse and carrying all its suitcase of problems, but At the same time, a lot was at stake in the operation to save his rival, as the Swiss journalist Yves Genier, author of Scandals chez Credit Suisse. “UBS benefits from the image of Switzerland, from its banking, and if Switzerland were to drop one of its two big banks, the other will suffer fatally in terms of reputation and image, and mistrust will set in.” In addition, the low price paid gives it a wide margin of maneuver to get a return on the acquisition if it is able to clean up the bank and strip it of the aura of instability and bad practices that have accompanied it in the last five years.

The operation puts a sad climax to a black week for the bank founded in 1856 by Alfred Escher to finance railway infrastructure that Switzerland lacked, including such emblematic projects as the Saint-Gothard tunnel that crosses the Alps. The entity, penalized by the continuous changes in its management team, and involved in a string of scandals that skyrocketed its legal bill and forced it to pay numerous fines to US, EU and Swiss regulators, has long been considered one of the weakest links in European banking, and that had been reflected in its listing on the Stock Market, with a drop of almost 90% in just five years.

In this fragile situation, with losses of 7,381 million in 2022, and announcements of more red numbers for 2023, he was caught up in the crisis of confidence unleashed last week in the US by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in the United States. Joined. It was joined by two pieces of news that lit the fuse: on Tuesday, in your annual report, Credit Suisse acknowledged “material weaknesses” in its financial reporting control systems. And on Wednesday, its main shareholder, the Saudi National Bank, owner of 9.88% of the titles, which accumulated losses of more than 500 million of its investment in just four months (now it will become more), said enough and announced that would not bring more money. That undermined its image as the bank’s lifeline in the event of a worsening crisis, and left Credit Suisse at the mercy of markets that showed no mercy.

The speed at which everything happened caught off guard even the Swiss politicians most attached to the evolution of the entity. This is the case of the deputy and vice president of the Socialist Party Samuel Bendahan, as he himself explains to this newspaper. “It is not new that Credit Suisse has problems. It has been mired in a governance crisis for years. Still, it has surprised us. It was not clear to us that we were going to get to this point. In my opinion, the international context has influenced, and all the precedents have caused investors to lose confidence quite quickly”.

confidence crisis

There was a little lapse in which everything seemed to settle. On Wednesday night, the Swiss National Bank said publicly that it would make liquidity available to Credit Suisse “if necessary.” And just a few hours later, in the early hours of Wednesday to Thursday, the bank announced that it would borrow up to 50 billion Swiss francs — a similar amount in euros. Stocks rebounded more than 20% in the following session, with some analysts suggesting that the bailout could calm things down in the short term and give managers room to restore confidence.

The joy, however, was short-lived. On Friday the stock returned to its old ways, losing 8%. Amid the noise about how far the contagion effect of the US banking crisis could go, the outflow of deposits from Credit Suisse accelerated, at a dizzying rate of more than 10,000 million daily, according to the Financial Times. That made the injection of capital from the central bank into a band-aid.

In that situation, a quick solution had to be found, and UBS emerged as the perfect way out: an apparently healthy bank, which since it was bailed out in 2008 due to its heavy exposure to subprime mortgages has shown itself to be much more resilient —it gained more than 7,000 million in 2022—, and that allows the Swiss flag to be kept on the entity, thus dispelling the fear on the part of the political class of a hostile purchase by a foreign bank disconnected from national interests.

Leopoldo Torralba, an economist at Arcano, believes that given the drift of Credit Suisse, there were only two options. “When a bank irretrievably loses the trust of depositories, such as Credit Suisse, there are only two short-term solutions: either nationalize it, or integrate it into another with the confidence of investors and depositories, as happened with Popular and Santander.”

100 insufficient days

The CEO of Credit Suisse, the German-Swiss Ulrich Körner, a restructuring expert with a past at UBS, asked upon his arrival in July for 100 days of grace to put the firm back on track. Among the measures adopted, he announced the dismissal of 9,000 workers until 2025, a 15% cut in expenses, and increased capital by 4,000 million. The Saudi National Bank (SNB) took advantage of this operation to enter the capital, in what it considered a unique opportunity to buy part of a historic Swiss bank at a bargain price. It also reduced its exposure to investment banking to focus on the equity business, divesting itself of businesses such as securitization, sold to Apollo last November.

The 100 days, however, have fallen short for Körner. In the almost eight months that have elapsed since his appointment, he has not been able to bring to fruition a bank that had been leaking for too long, and that when he seemed to have hit bottom, it sank a little more. Now it will be the turn of UBS, a bank that knew how to get out of the hole it fell into during the financial crisis of 2008, when it came to be worth less on the Stock Market than Credit Suisse.

Five Days agenda

The most important economic appointments of the day, with the keys and the context to understand their scope.


Subscribe to continue reading

Read without limits

Disclaimer: If you need to update/edit/remove this news or article then please contact our support team Learn more

Deborah Acker

I write epic fantasy; self-published via KDP. Devoted dog mom to my 10 yr old GSD, Shadow! DM not a priority; slow response at best #amwriting #author.

Leave a Reply