What happened to Delphine Jubillar ? For almost two years, this 33-year-old woman from Tarn, married and mother of two children, has disappeared without a trace. The facts took place on the night of December 15 to 16, 2020 and despite the investigation by the authorities, the provisional detention of her husband Cédric who is the number 1 suspect but denies any involvement, as well as the dedication of his relatives to find a clue, the mystery continues to hang over the case. A file in which the journalist of the Point Valentine Arama who signed the book Delphine Jubillar, a disappearance – Investigation at the heart of a news item and reveals surprising elements.
In this captivating book in the face of an unsolved case, Valentine Arama brings to light a staggering fact: her friend Anne, one of the last to have seen her alive, reveals that she received a notification on her phone a few days after her disappearance. , which is enough to amaze her: “On January 14, it is the turn of Delphine’s Instagram account to activate to subscribe to Anne’s account, which the latter never uses.“, writes the journalist of the Justice service. What what to revive the hopes of finding a track, even of finding the mother of Louis and Elyah alive, but it was in truth a non-human activity: “Investigators note that this is most likely the follow/unfollow principle [abonnement/désabonnement], a fully robotic application system that subscribes the chosen account to other random accounts.“
A phone not found but…
It was therefore again a false hope for those close to Delphine Jubillar. The mother’s phone, which has not been found since her disappearance, nevertheless remains an important lead for investigators. A new expertise was carried out by the technicians of the gendarmerie specialized in telephony to explain the mystery of the activations, so far unexplained. When the 30-year-old disappeared, her Huawei P30 Pro phone was activated six times from 0:07 a.m. to 6:52 a.m., a manipulation that can only be the result of human intervention. According to the documents of the analysis, his device was located at that time in an area included in the very heart of the housing estate of rue Yves-Montand. Enough to assure the prosecution of the involvement of Cédric Jubillar, because only he could have used his phone in such a small area.
An investigative technique that lacks reliability, however, because many factors can blur the information. On the side of the lawyers of the alleged culprit who was in divorce proceedings and drags a bad reputation, this theory incriminating their client does not hold because “to 6:52 a.m., Cédric Jubillar was in the presence of the gendarmes.
Cédric Jubillar remains presumed innocent of the charges against him until the final judgment of this case.