You are currently viewing One by one, who voted against the income tax to the judges

Much of the expectations regarding the Budget 2023 They were focused on what would happen with the initiative so that judges, prosecutors and judicial workers begin to pay the Income Tax, which until now only reaches those who entered the Judiciary since 2017. Finally, most of the opposition blocs of the Chamber of Deputies, along with some pro-government deputies from trade union backgrounds, they rejected this article promoted by the ruling party.

In the particular vote on this point, article 100 of the 2023 Budget Law, they voted against 134 legislators and legislators. The positive met 116 accessions and there was 6 absences.

the block of Together for Change voted unanimously against this initiative together with the interbloc Federal and the Leftexcept for the two absences of Gustavo Santos (PRO, Cordoba) and Margaret Stolbizer (Federal Meeting, Buenos Aires).

In the Front of All there was 5 downvotes, most union pull legislatorsamong them sergio palazzo (FdT, Buenos Aires), Secretary General of La Bancaria; Y vanessa siley (FdT, Buenos Aires), General Secretary of the Federation of Unions of Judicial Workers of the Argentine Republic.

In addition, they voted against claudia ormachea (FdT, Buenos Aires), Gender Secretary of the Banking Association; Maria Rose Martinez (FdT, Buenos Aires), graphic workers representative; Y Claudio Anibal Cisneros (FdT, Tucumán), Secretary of Administration of La Bancaria.

A curious fact occurred with the absences, which were marked mainly by the libertarian blocs. In this way, the deputies Javier Milei (Freedom Advances, CABA), Victoria Villarruel (Freedom Advances, CABA) and Caroline Piparo (Avanza Libertad, Buenos Aires), did not vote despite their sustained rejection of any new tax.

The rejected article stated that “in the case of magistrates, officials and employees of the Judicial Power of the Nation and of the provinces and of the Public Ministry of the Nation, all income will be included in taxable income, regardless of the date of their appointment and for all the concepts that make up their remuneration”.

Source: Pagina12

Disclaimer: If you need to update/edit/remove this news or article then please contact our support team Learn more

Varun Kumar

Varun Kumar is a freelance writer working on news website. He contributes to Our Blog and more. Wise also works in higher ed sustainability and previously in stream restoration. He loves running, trees and hanging out with her family.

Leave a Reply