"And are you going to tell me?": García-Pelayo hit Matamoros in ‘In the name of Rocío’

The sixth chapter of ‘In the name of Rocío’ has served to show the two faces that Rocío Carrasco seems to have, as Rocío Carrasco affirms and narrates, and this is confirmed by some journalists from the network. Nevertheless, Kiko Matamoros has once again been the dissident of this whole story.

In line with the anecdote that the daughter of ‘the greatest’ brings to light about her aunt, who told her mother: “How am I going to dye you if now they do my hair”. And this, when the singer was in the worst stage of her illness and coinciding with the television debut of Amador Mohedano’s ex.

Paloma: “It’s ugly and derogatory. It’s neither pretty, nor ‘dear sister-in-law’, nor that ‘she was like my sister'”

But things don’t stop there, since María Patiño has assured on Sandra Barneda’s program that, years ago, during her time in Houston, Benito did not speak in a good tone of the chipionera through the corridors of Mediaset, in addition to putting Ortega Cano and Amador himself back and a half. Paloma García-Pelayo agrees and adds more information, more hurtful, if possible:

“He dared to refer to Rocío Jura in an ugly and derogatory way. It is very easy to put a message and comment to anyone who participates in television to say: ‘That’s a lie’, without further ado. There are people who heard it, who lived it and who knew it. It is unfortunate, but it is a reality and Rocío Carrasco what she has done is discover the double face “.

It was at this point that Kiko Matamoros dared to interrupt her to ask for explanations: “But, I think you have to name these things. When we speak very ugly ways of referring to, we will have to say the formsbecause if not…” A claim that comes just after reading a message from Ortega Cano in which he denies what Rocío defended in the docuseries, despite having graphic documents that corroborate it, as Patiño recalled.

Paloma limited herself to replying with a forceful ‘punch’ from which she did not know how to get out: “And you are going to tell me, that you are simply transmitting something about Ortega Cano that you have not verified? And you are going to tell me how far I have to say? Nope, Kiko. No”https://www.elconfidencial.com/television/programas-tv/2022-09-20/paloma-garcia-pelayo-matamoros-nombre-rocio_3493314/.”If I tell you that it is ugly and derogatory, it is a qualifier, but I’m not going to say exactly what. But he is neither pretty, nor ‘dear sister-in-law’, nor that ‘she was like my sister’. Ugly and derogatory,” she adds.

Montse Suárez covers the mouth of Kiko Matamoros for a hesitation in ‘In the name of Rocío’

Á.Roldán

“There is information that Rocío Carrasco gives that I do not put into solfa, but there is a lady alluded to who answers,” the collaborator insists again, despite not presenting more evidence than a WhatsApp letter. Sandra Barneda, forced to finish off: “And there is a lady named María Patiño who says that in the halls [de Telecinco] Rosa Benito at some point referred to Rocío Jurado in a derogatory tone“.

The sixth chapter of ‘In the name of Rocío’ has served to show the two faces that Rocío Carrasco seems to have, as Rocío Carrasco affirms and narrates, and this is confirmed by some journalists from the network. Nevertheless, Kiko Matamoros has once again been the dissident of this whole story.