Rafa Tenathe manager of the CEME aesthetic clinic, investigated for the case of Silvia, the woman who suffered an infection after surgery in April and remains in a coma, has assured that the care was adequate and it is not known how she contracted this septicemia, while a worker has incurred contradictions with this investigated.

This has been detailed to EFE by legal sources after the two statements made on Tuesday by the head of the Court of Instruction 46 of Madrid: that of the aforementioned Tena as the legal representative of the investigated clinic and that of a CEME worker, who attended Silvia in the postoperative period, as a witness.

According to the defense of Silvia’s family, this worker has incurred contradictions with those investigatedmaking it clear that these “have lied” and that the affected “had alarming, diverse, clinical signs, that she was suffering from a very serious infectious process”, although she has not given more details out of judicial respect.

[El médico de la operación que dejó a Silvia en la UCI fue condenado en 2011 a 78.000 € por negligencia]

The magistrate keeps two doctors and the clinic itself under investigation for alleged bodily harm due to imprudence to Silvia Idalia Serrano, the 34-year-old woman who underwent a triple aesthetic operation at the CEME clinic on April 29, after which she was discharged but had an infection that led to her death on May 6. admission to the ICU of the La Paz hospital, where he remains in an induced coma.

Tena has defended that they have no responsibility in the state in which Silvia derived, since the operation went well and they do not know the origin of her subsequent infection, and has provided several documents that the court had required to prove it, according to legal sources. .

[Silvia tiene el 30% del cuerpo en carne viva: “No es la bella durmiente que despertará, está devorada”]

He has reported that as a result of the complaint from Silvia’s family, the clinic has been subjected to several inspections by the Community of Madrid, all without problems. The lawyer Francesc Jufresa, who represents the family of the affected, has criticized that this representative of the accused clinic You have only answered the questions of the judge and your lawyeras the two investigated doctors did last week, who also rejected the crimes they are accused of.

However, he considered that this Tuesday’s session was “very positive in research” because “it has been revealed that the people who treated Silvia are not telling the truth” due to the testimony of the worker who treated her in the days following the operation, which has contradicted what was claimed by those investigated.

Silvia Idalia Serrano with her partner, Daniel Poyato.


He has not revealed details about these contradictions but has assured that this witness has answered all parties with the obligation to tell the truth, since otherwise he would incur false testimony, and “the key is the contradiction between a witness and an investigated “.

“I think today it is very clear that Silvia had alarming, diverse, clinical signs that she was suffering from a very serious infectious processand I am glad that it is beginning to clarify how she was treated and how she has been allowed to reach this terrible state that she is in,” he added.

The Prosecutor’s Office was not present in this Tuesday’s statement, as in the previous two, it has criticized. This lawyer is collecting information from more people affected by possible negligence of the CEME clinic, and plans to bring them all together and request that they testify in Silvia’s case.

Disclaimer: If you need to update/edit/remove this news or article then please contact our support team Learn more

J. A. Allen

Author, blogger, freelance writer. Hater of spiders. Drinker of wine. Mother of hellions.