It was summer. The girl was between 8 and 9 years old. In one of the minor’s home visits, the subject identified as PP and 20 years old, took advantage of and sexually abused the little girl. The events were repeated several times and in an oral and public trial it was decided to sentence PP to serve 8 years in prison for effective compliance, for being criminally responsible for the crime of simple sexual abuse repeated in a real contest with sexual abuse with carnal access.
According to the investigation, the minor was 8 years old and used to stay at the accused’s house. The subject took advantage of when they were alone in the house, entered the room where the girl was and took the opportunity to touch her.
This same situation was repeated repeatedly, until the last time it happened was when the minor was approximately 9 years old and had come from shopping, the accused grabbed her and accessed her carnally until she was hurt.
Although the Prosecutor’s Office had requested 10 years in prison for PP to the detriment of the minor as material author (art. 45 of the CP), they finally ruled 8 years that he must serve in the Provincial Penitentiary Service.