“The attitude of Batet sounds like prevarication to justify a major rigging ». It says Ignatius Gil Lazaro Fourth Vice President of Congress, of Vox, and a very close witness to everything that happened on Thursday in the vote on the labor reform. Vox is one step away from filing a complaint for prevarication against the president of the Lower House, Meritxell Batet. In an interview to TODAY RESPOND from OKDAILY, Gil Lazarus He speaks several times of “a rigging and a capital tongo” and highlights that there was a “premeditated alteration and a hijacking of the will of the camera” by Batet. He says that it was “a direct attack on national sovereignty, the rudest of Sánchez and sanchismo, and that it had never occurred in the life of the chamber.” With all this, furthermore, says Ignacio Gil Lázaro, “Batet lied flagrantly and publicly to the Congress in plenary session.” «His behavior may be clearly prevaricatory», finishes. Vox is “finishing to substantiate a series of facts” to possibly file a lawsuit for prevarication against Batet.

“Batet lied to the camera. He publicly stated that the Board had heard of the matter [la petición del diputado del PP Alberto Casero de anular su voto telemático y votar presencialmente] and that he made a decision. It is absolutely false. When the Table is invoked, it is in its entirety and neither I nor the rest of the members of the Table (except PP and PSOE) were informed. Much less the Table made a decision as Batet said. «His blatant lie to justify the rigging -he points out- makes his conduct could be criminal and in that line we are in Vox studying the corresponding actions ».

For Gil Lazarus, «everything is so funny, so funny, so funny -he repeats- that everything smells of nerves and rigging». Ignacio Gil Lázaro remembers that Meritxel Batet comes from afar, from the first minute in which Pedro Sánchez decided that she would be the president of Congress: «Batet is being a president of part». “More typical of a Bolivarian Assembly in Venezuela?”, we specified. He nods in agreement and recalls the case, among others, of the former deputy kicking the police of Podemos, Alberto Rodriguez: «They built a whole series of artifices to try to nullify the sentence of the Supreme Court. The objective, impartial and arbitral character that the presidency of the chamber should have is not being exercised by Mrs. Batet».

Gil Lazarus remember that Batet not only did not heed the request of deputy Alberto Casero or did not inform the Table. Remember that the telematic vote must be collated by phone in person by the Chamber’s services and that did not happen either. Without this previous step, the vote of Home should never have reached President Batet as a valid vote.

Source

Disclaimer: If you need to update/edit/remove this news or article then please contact our support team Learn more

Then24

The News 24 is the place where you get news about the World. we cover almost every topic so that you don’t need to find other sites.

Leave a Reply