You are currently viewing “Charity with someone else’s pocket”: Javier Milei attacked those who called his raffle ‘marketing’

Javier MileiHe kept his campaign promise lottery his first diet national deputy. After turns of chance, the winner turned out to be a follower of Kirchnerism. In this framework, the reference freedom advances attacked the political and opposition leaders who described his contest as “marketing”. At that point, he pointed out that those who donate the only thing they do is “charity with someone else’s pocket”.

“The truth is that we were surprised by questions of a quantitative nature. More than 7 million people passed through the page and more than a million people signed up for the draw, it was something impressive, ”said the deputy on CNN radio. After that, he was consulted by the opposition leaders who shouted to the sky for the liberal’s move.

In this sense, Milei argued that “donating the diet has to do with a philosophical question” since he considers that the State is the “enemy”. At that point, he argued that it is a violent organization that “removes the fruit of our work by force and this is a mechanism to return the money to its original owners.” At that point, he affirmed that the political arch “was very uncomfortable.”

“I don’t know if it’s because of the deep envy of the media impact that happened with this. They say it is a marketing phenomenon, the impact it has had has hurt them a lot,” Milei remarked. At that point, the referent of liberalism affirmed that after his lottery, society knows how much a deputy earns and pointed out: “You realize that with that they cannot sustain the standard of living they lead. It shows them that they are clearly dirty”.

When asked why he did not draw it. The president indicated that “donating it was doing charity with someone else’s pocket.” In that sense, he pointed against the Left Front: “Many people donate to foundations like the left does, but they donate to a foundation that finances their political activity. That directionality gives it a level of arbitrariness that is in contradiction.

Is it the same as populism?

Milei also faced the uncomfortable question about the similarities between her draw and the policies carried out by populist governments. “Populism is taking money from one person by force to give it to another for a purely electoral purpose. Here I directly return something that is mine, that diet became mine, but since I question the origin of the money, I return it to its original owner, “he replied forcefully.

Disclaimer: If you need to update/edit/remove this news or article then please contact our support team Learn more

Then24

The News 24 is the place where you get news about the World. we cover almost every topic so that you don’t need to find other sites.

Leave a Reply