On November 14, the Argentine Republic will celebrate the general legislative elections. With the Bell already started, the candidates a national deputy Ricardo López Murphy (Together) already Buenos Aires senator Teresa Garcia (In Front of All) they crossed in a television interview and they got sparks when referring to Budget 2022, to the social plans Yet the elimination from compensation by dismissal, among other topics.

It was in the Sunday cycle We Are In Time (A24). There, the now former Minister of Government of the province of Buenos Aires assured that “Peronism has always been willing to talk and convene the different forces and political sectors on issues that are central”, beyond that – he acknowledged – there are ” very different views on some issues ”.

“There are points on which we will surely all agree. I suppose that López Murphy and I are going to agree that it is impossible to have a country with 40% poverty with the degree of indigence that we have ”, remarked García, who, despite affirming“ not ”to be“ one of those who says’ Ah , but Macri ‘”, launched:“ The four years of the previous government were very hard for the working classes and the middle and lower-middle classes because measures were taken that have to do with the impact on the pocket in everyday life ”.

Faced with this, López Murphy said that “the National Congress is the place for dialogue and exchange of political force,” and he retorted: “That is where we have to deal seriously and responsibly with the Budget, which I think is poorly formulated, as ordered by the Government ”. “It is a budget that does not respond to reality, but the role will be of those who are representing the people in Congress to resolve that debate to give it seriousness and projection,” he explained.

García was not silent and replied: “I want to enter into a counterpoint. I share that the scope of discussion of the main lines of management is the Congress, but I also want to remember that in 2010 this same political force represented by López Murphy left the national government without a budget. Nothing worse for someone who has to manage to run out of budget, “he reproached.

“No one is going to believe that I am going to remain silent in that debate,” replied the economist and aspiring national deputy for United Republicans, and completed: “Here you have to be realistic that political discrepancies have to respond to both sides. When there is a parliamentary majority, one cannot ignore it, neither from one side nor the other. Sometimes there is an attempt, a will, to ignore that political reality ”.

Meanwhile, García brought up the social plans: “The previous government unjustifiably increased the social plans. We had to implement them due to the pandemic, because as a result people lost their fun, their jobs. We must rebuild social plans in a resource that bets on the formality of employment, “he appealed.

And he developed: “There are a thousand ways and a thousand ideas to contribute to private companies, because other things must also be formalized, such as ART, social works. The State has a very important investment in this matter. I know that the government is discussing how to carry out this reconversion. In a pandemic it was impossible to deactivate it and in the previous four years, the one who would have to respond in this regard is María Eugenia Vidal and Carolina Stanley ”, he shot.

For his part, López Murphy stressed: “Since long before the previous government and that of the Kirchners (Néstor and Cristina Fernández) I was very careful about social support.” “I always thought that the best social support is to generate work and that is done by preparing and creating circumstances both in educational training and in the regulation of employment contracts and in the taxes charged on the use of labor,” he considered .

The official leader disagreed with her head upon hearing the above, and made “one final observation.” “I agree that measures must be taken to encourage job creation and discourage the informal. In the middle of the PASO campaign, a proposal was made from the opposition that we must be able to explain it and it is the elimination of severance pay, ”he objected.

“In that we are going to have different views. That is not a way to encourage investment and production, that is a way to eliminate a workers’ right with its consequences ”, García remarked to the economist, who replied:“ It is a central point, but let me tell you that I am not they are going to catch on that one ”, and he clarified: I have studied this issue and any modification to the new job refers, the acquired right will not be affected”. “Very good clarification,” said the forehead, and López Murphy closed: “This issue no one comes up with.”

Disclaimer: If you need to update/edit/remove this news or article then please contact our support team Learn more